February 14th, 2026
Dear Leaders,
Lately, I’ve been thinking about innovation and what actually compels people to break the mold of what is.
We like to imagine innovation as flashy. Fast. Loud. The kind of breakthrough that reshapes industries like the internet, the smartphone, the platforms that alter how we live and work. We tend to notice innovation once it is tangible and undeniable.
But history tells a more precise story. The innovations that often shift industries and societies rarely begin that way. They begin as refusals. As individuals decide they will no longer accept the limits placed on them, even when those limits are enforced by institutions, norms, or so-called expertise.
I want to highlight two innovators from our BREAKTHRU framework: Issa Rae and Dr. Daniel Hale Williams, both featured in our book.
This Week’s Reflection: Issa Rae and Dr. Daniel Hale Williams
They lived more than a century apart. They worked in entirely different fields: entertainment and medicine. And yet, their leadership stories are deeply connected by the same truth: they had to refuse to accept what is.
Dr. Daniel Hale Williams performed one of the first successful open-heart surgeries in the United States in 1893. This was decades before antibiotics, blood transfusions, or modern surgical protocols. The risk alone was staggering. But the resistance he faced went far beyond medical skepticism.
As a Black physician, Williams was barred from practicing in most hospitals. Black patients were routinely denied care, and Black doctors were denied training opportunities that were considered standard for their white counterparts. Williams knew the system intimately—not from theory, but from experience.
So when the door stayed closed, he did what innovators so often do.
He built a new one.
Williams co-founded Provident Hospital in Chicago, the first Black-run hospital in the United States, creating a place where Black physicians and nurses (check out Emma Ann Reynolds too) could practice and Black patients could receive care with dignity. Provident wasn’t just a workaround; it was a reimagining of what medicine could be. His groundbreaking surgery happened there not by accident, but because he changed the conditions under which innovation was allowed to exist.
His leadership wasn’t just technical. It was institutional. He expanded what was possible by expanding where it was possible.
More than a hundred years later, Issa Rae, full name Jo-Issa Rae Diop, encountered a different kind of gatekeeping, but the pattern was familiar.
Hollywood told her that her stories were “too specific.” That audiences wouldn’t relate. That there wasn’t room for her voice unless it was reshaped, softened, or translated for someone else’s comfort. Even as she earned accolades, the message remained subtle but persistent: this works because it’s unusual, but don’t assume it should become the norm.
Issa didn’t argue. She didn’t wait. She created.
The Misadventures of Awkward Black Girl began as a scrappy web series—self-funded, self-produced, deeply personal. It was funny, uncomfortable, and unapologetically specific. And it worked. Not because it tried to appeal to everyone, but because it refused to dilute itself for anyone. She later produced one of my favorite shows of all time, Insecure.
Like Williams, Rae didn’t innovate by assimilating. She innovated by insisting that her perspective was not a deviation from the norm, but a necessary correction to it. She built proof before she was offered permission, and in doing so, changed what leadership in entertainment could look like.
Today, Issa Rae is no longer asking for a seat. She’s building the table. Through her company, Hoorae, she’s producing, investing, and opening doors for stories and creators that would once have been labeled “too niche.” What began as a refusal has become infrastructure.
Neither of them set out to be symbols. They were builders. Leaders responding to systems that made their presence inconvenient, and choosing to lead anyway.
Why This Matters To Me
As I think about our work at BREAKTHRU, I see the SLE® as an act of innovation rooted in the same instinct we see in Issa Rae and Dr. Daniel Hale Williams: a refusal to be shaped by systems that were never designed to reflect the full truth of the people who occupy them.
Most leadership assessments are static by design. They sort, label, and contain. Tools like DiSC (created in 1928) can offer insight, but they often freeze people in place, asking them to conform to a category instead of evolve beyond it. And too often, those boxes quietly push people out of leadership altogether.
The SLE® is built differently. It assumes leadership lives in everyone and is activated through individual expression, and that when people are given language that truly reflects who they are, how they think, and what they value, something shifts. That shift is belief, the kind that fuels leadership as an act, not a title. (And today, advancements in generative AI make that level of personalized activation possible at scale.)
Both Issa Rae and Dr. Williams built what didn’t exist yet. As we continue to break into the world of leadership assessment and development, I’m committed to leading with that same innovator energy, clear-eyed, unwilling to contort, and focused on what doesn’t exist yet, refusing to wait for permission to build it.
From Reflection to Action
As you move through this week, consider sitting with this:
How might my identity, experience, or point of view be the very thing that allows me to see what others cannot?
Because the leaders who change the future rarely look like the ones we’ve been waiting for.
Until Next Week
We’ll continue digging into activating leaders together, and next week we turn to really trying to understand the genius and legacy of Grace Lee Boggs.
|






